CHAT #44 (30 October 2014, pages 48-49)
Over 44 years since the case went public and still they get it wrong!
Seán Manchester's comment on Natasha Wynarczyk's article:
"I really cannot understand why Chat magazine has to mention me when it gets so much wrong. Natasha Wynarczyk did not contact me and certainly did not quote accurately from my book The Highgate Vampire (which, of course, she does not mention), assumIng, that is, she has ever read it in the first place, which I seriously doubt. Unfortunately, wrong attributions and unnecessary inaccuracies permeate the article from start to finish.
"There is a picture of a crucifix and stake which are part of a vast
collection of vampirological accoutrements held by me (the Stock
Photo archive would have identified this fact, but Chat magazine did
not for some mysterious reason) which was published alongside and
across an image of David Farrant who is captioned 'vampire expert'
when he is nothing of the sort and, moreover, does not claim any
expertise in that subject.
"I am accused of 'decrying' Farrant's 'expertise' which is palpable
nonsense. What 'expertise,' one might wonder? Farrant once claimed
to be a witch and is nowadays closer to an atheist/agnostic. I am a
traditionalist and have always held strong Christian beliefs. As we
each subscribe to entirely different belief systems, his modus
operandi and mine are entirely different. He does not believe in the
existence of vampires, something he makes very clear on his website
and in interviews he has given down the years. Yet he is apparently
a 'vampire expert.'
"Dates and descriptions of alleged incidents and facts are all over
the place in Natasha Wynarczyk's sensationalist article, rendering
it no more than entertainment for Hallowe'en, albeit misinforming
readers of what really occurred, and little else. I would very much
rather future reference to me be omitted, but we know that is just
not going to happen. It would be a little difficult in view of the
fact that I am the person who led the investigation into the case
and finally exorcised the vampiric entity just over forty years ago
(not mentioned, of course, in Wynarczyk's article). The bottom line
is that I steer clear of publicity, whereas the other fellow does
not. Thus Chat is content to cobble together whatever they can lay
their hands on without a care for the facts, resulting in the
travesty we end up with in Natasha Wynarczyk's article."
No comments:
Post a Comment